Possibilities

Saturday, November 11, 2006

uni exam 11.11.06

“Creativity is a type of learning process where the teacher and pupil are located in the same individual” Arthur Koestler

Question 1
Lecturer: Allan Coman
What are the qualities I would like to have as a teacher?

Inspiration - this would be the most important, personal quality for a teacher in a creative learning community.

Critical reflection - To have this ability, is to allow all other qualities to shine. Without it I would not go past the point I am at now or even was at before doing this course. I would be more inclined to call it Conscious Critical Reflection.
Ability to learn - Without this personal characteristic a teacher could grow stale and their work would never grow.

To understand deep learning, constructivist teaching and the whole creative learning community - I think to know this is extraordinarily important, something I have learnt along the path of my own education and the more I learn, the more I want to know. Use of teaching and learning theories:With regard to this question I would hope that I could always be open to teaching styles and learning theories. With a very busy schedule, it does take that bit of extra effort to move away from what has become "comfortable" but is always worth it. I work closely with a colleague and together we are always looking at the possibilities of one or more of the studied theories. Critically, I think that we can always do better, but it is still one step at a time and we just keep learning. In our learning community, the children and their teacher/ guardian, travel together along a 7 year path throughout primary school. This relationship becomes a Special Place. It creates a bond, perhaps similar to that of a parent/child relationship where we can ride the bumpy moments in life alongside the smooth ones and feel safe in each others presence.
Important?Most definitely.Do I feel like a parent of an extraordinarily large family?Yes but I wouldn't give up one of them. =============================================

Question 2
Lecturer Allan Coman

“The principle goal of education is to create men who are capable of doing new things, not simply of repeating what other generations have done - men who are creative, inventive and discoverers” - Jean Piaget

The underpinning or foundations of Constructivist Theory of Education is supported by Piaget and Vygotsky through their differences.

Piaget suggests that children develop cognitive structures by responding to physical experiences within their environment, preceding their learning.

Vygotsky suggests that social interaction plays a fundamental role in the processes of cognitive development.

Big words aside, both work towards the mental development of the child.

Both Theorists believe in constructivism. Their suggestions have brought about a conscious change within learning environments as well as home environments. Piaget’s theories have been brought into the home through developing a nurturing, caring environment, allowing the child to develop cognitive thought patterns prior to schooling. In school, rote learning is removed and children are able to learn in an environment that physically stimulates them. ‘Monkey see monkey’ do is no longer the basis of education, rather ‘here is what we can use to help us develop own ideas and concepts - how can we use it?’ Vygotsky’s suggestions take this further, allowing social interaction into the equation. Working with peers, teacher input, and individual study, are all supported through Vygotsky’s suggestions. Although there are some fundamental differences between the two, they were both working towards the same outcome – that constructivism is not only necessary for the future of education, it is a must.

Question 3
Lecturer Allan Coman

NSW Board of studies The NSW Board of Studies syllabuses are designed to assist teachers in their quest for educating the child.

Scope and sequence of the literary text type – page 68 in the English k to 6 syllabus – is set out to help the teacher know what needs to be taught during the stage and suggestions on how to approach the subject as well as noting the different text types.

Teaching programme – page 86 – Actually does have suggestions based around constructivist style education. Suggestions are broad, leaving room for creative ideas whilst giving points to consider on sequencing, outcomes, resources and activities.

Assessing – page 87 – Offers (demands) a certain assessment type of the teacher that perhaps could be scrapped and re-written after a course on Constructivist Education. Although it covers the various assessment types I personally find them inadequate and demeaning for the student’s confidence.

Evaluating this?
A perfect lesson could not be derived only from this information. They are only a concrete block, a foundation stone to keep on track with the necessary learning sequence. A perfect lesson must come from within the teacher, someone who knows their students and can call on all their experience and the experience of their colleagues, local community and now the world community. I would not give my students computers, but the internet has allowed me access to a world of educationalists, styles and information to help me achieve excellence in teaching.

Saturday, September 02, 2006

How can I help?




TEACHERS MAKE A DIFFERENCE
Journal
Teacher make a difference is the topic and critical assessment journey this journal will take me on. Not only a university requirement it is a life necessity to achieve the best that I can for my students, my school and myself.

I have read Margaret Wheatley’s articles on ‘Schools as a living system’ and ‘Restoring hope to the future through critical reflection’. http://www.margaretwheatley.com/articles/lifetoschools.html
http://www.margaretwheatley.com/articles/restoringhope.html

In the first article I read, at least in my understanding of it, Margaret talks about the natural flow of life and how much of the western world has tried to ‘reinvent the wheel’ so to speak by trying to improve on the wisdom of nature and force an unnatural approach to life. Applied to the education of children, this has become extraordinarily abstract, leaving both teachers and students bored and frustrated with little room to move due to B.O.S. requirements. I feel lucky that I work in an environment where creative teaching is not only encouraged, it is a must, and therefore requires not only thought activated preparation but work from the feeling and will life of the teacher.
“We are surrounded by great teachers – life itself – the natural world.” - Margaret Wheatley

I believe Margaret works strongly from her feeling life and has come to understand the natural processes that are not only essential but the truth. It is fantastic to see that her work is not overlooked by tertiary institutions, but viewed as a useful and credible. In restoring hope to the future Margaret talks about her work with the idea of her group ‘From The Four Directions’. Here, they work towards helping local communities work together to create global change. This we have seen in the world already and no doubt some of that is due to her work in this direction. This is reflective of what we can do within our own community eg the school.

As teachers:
•We have the ability to adapt, change, modify, introduce and remove that which could be harmful to the student i.e. given at too early an age.
• We are able to come together and discuss relevant issues for our class/school and ourselves and improve what we can, even if the steps are small, as all steps are heading in the right direction.
•Learning is not only for the student. It is a life journey and we are travelling it together, even if we are not all at the same place at the same time. Isolating ourselves from what the world has to offer by staying with tried and tested and exhausted means of education removes our ability to reflect and think and, more often than not, we rush through each lesson-term-year trying to achieve narrow goals to please the official goals, negating our responsibility to the individuals within the classroom including ourselves. This sounds critical and maybe it is, so I will look at it again later.

“We want to create a global voice on behalf of those practices and values that nourish and sustain the human spirit and all life” – Margaret Wheatley.

If this statement were to be taken, declared dogma, I believe this too would become lifeless and the path would be worn to shreds in no time at all. Her statement in context with teaching in schools, has the potential to be life-filled and imaginative if teachers are given the opportunity to work freely, according to the needs of the children; their backgrounds, community and spiritual beliefs are all taken into account. Here the education must be suited to the needs of the particular region. Imagine how useless it is to have indigenous children, (who grow and learn in the bush with their communities in a completely different way to children who have grown in the city or residential areas), doing the national test that is offered/forced on the year 3, 5 and 7 classes in schools. I have heard from teachers of these bush schools that often it is a successful day just having the students turn up let alone forcing Mathematical and English/Linguistic skill upon them. These children obviously need to be educated in a different manner and their teachers should be allowed the freedom to approach their education accordingly – to make a difference. Who are we to judge the intelligence rating of these bush children when their way of thinking is completely different to ours? This is not a racial remark, just an observation that may need to be considered by the bureaucracy when working towards what’s best for all our children. Margaret suggests that there is no boss in a living system and that change happens from within…maybe we should be paying attention.




∞∞∞∞∞∞∞∞

Sunday September 06

Ok. I have been reading up on Blooms Taxonomy. The suggestions made by Bloom are valid and interesting, although by the age of his work and the applications it is now used for, show that it is already in use throughout many societies.

Making it a conscious thought stream seems to be the task I have before me today. The revised taxonomy is where I have found the work more interesting and viable for my class room situation although on my own personal web questing I have found it also used for tertiary education and work place training amongst other things.

Applying this to my own work will mean modifying some of my approaches and adapting the format to suit the young age group with which I work and the type of education we provide, will not only be done fairly easily but will also add to the lesson structure…the point is now to remember, understand, apply, analyse, evaluate and create with what I have read. Seems to be a tool for teachers to learn and use too!
John Hattie of the University of Auckland
has put together a study on what makes an expert teacher, pointing out that this is essential for students to learn as they are the largest variance in the children’s lives when it comes to learning. Hattie’s Pie Chart shows that after the children themselves (50%), teachers have the most influence on a child’s life (30%). Here we could then feel a little self-important, or we could look at the true major influence on a child’s life and their education and acknowledge that it is the child itself who has the greatest influence on their outcomes.
Expert or excellent teachers would then have to look at what they could do to help the child bring forth from themselves all that is possible and that could-well be everything. Each child has the potential to achieve in all aspects of their lives. Now I /we have to figure out how we can best help them to achieve this goal. Hattie acknowledges the idiot proof system we have in place to ensure that teachers teach the ‘right stuff’ with the national testing movements to maximise the narrow forms of achievements. (http://www.acer.edu.au/workshops/documents/Teachers_Make_a_Difference_Hattie.pdf#search=%22Teachers%20make%20a%20difference%22)
He goes on to suggest that we must identify what it means to be an expert and experienced teacher and become an excellent teacher. Hattie has identified the following 5 major dimensions as critical for classification as an expert teacher although I would rather call them an excellent teacher…so I will.
An excellent teacher:
1. can identify essential representations of their subjects
2. can guide learning through classroom interaction
3. can monitor learning and provide feedback
4. can attend to affective influences
Can, is the critical word here. Positive reflection for the children will be their most powerful asset. If they believe they can’t, the work will be a burden to them and ‘struggling’ through school will be their strongest memory, whereas can, will carry them through not only school, but life, and we know what a journey that can be.
I guess that makes can't, a four letter word!
∞∞∞∞∞∞∞∞

Wednesday 13th September
Can’t, has been remove from my classroom. This is not to say that the children are unable to express the idea of not comprehending the work, but allows them to be more creative with their word use and more conscious of what they are saying. Their peers have rallied to the idea and are supporting each other through encouragement and humour. This has bee very effective. Those who used this word without thought have almost dropped it from their vocabulary, and are pleased to be able to pick up their teacher (me) when I let it slip. Lots of fun and constructive games in finding new expressions.
Friday 15th September

In attempting to work with Hattie’s ideas of excellent teachers, I have been analysing my teaching methods.
1. can identify essential representations of their subjects.
My interpretation of this is finding what the subject matter is in essence, and translating this for the children into something they can grasp.
Let’s look at Punctuation. Earlier this year we studied the 12 points of punctuation. I looked at each point and created a character out of it, giving it a human form and developed a story around these characters.
For example:
Capital letters were characterised by the captain of a ship. Captain Capital was a leader. He gave the orders and his crew of little letters (lower case) followed his orders. He was loud and somewhat bossy. He came with a short verse as follows: I’m Captain Capital, brave and bold I lead the way each time. Name words; or a sentence you have heard, My crew will finish the line.
Queenie Quota Lot was the quotation marks. She was a gossip columnist and wrote quotes on everything that was said. Sometimes this was not a good thing, but the children enjoyed her abilities whilst getting the essentials of her task.
Wrappa Brackets (who had dread locks and was a cool fella) helped Queenie out by explaining what she meant, when she wasn’t being clear .
These and many more filled the main lesson story, getting the point across, (pardon the pun). These characters have been helping with punctuation throughout the year. I believe that this has been essential in helping the children understand who does what and we have included them in our class play which is yet to be performed.
I guess that does get the essential representation across of the subject matter. This has been my approach throughout my teaching career and although I have not always been 100% successful, I have managed to create something for the children to learn by.

2. can guide learning through classroom interaction
It is not entirely impossible that I fell down a little in this area during the punctuation lesson. The children were organised into group work only later in the year, at a time where I felt it more appropriate for them, as they are a young class by class 3 standards.
Classroom interaction came about through discussion, small role play examples and teacher directed work. There were still a few frowns of confusion from some of the students, although they have now started to grasp the more common punctuation marks. Having said that, I believe it is quite normal in a class environment for some of the children to not to gather all the information straight away. Obviously I won’t be dropping the subject and, after the work we have done in uni and the educators we have studied, many ideas have sprung forth on different ways to approach teaching. I can say that I prefer some of teaching types and ideas more than others but all are valid and worthy of exploration.
∞∞∞∞∞∞∞∞∞
Monday 18th October
3. can monitor learning and provide feedback
Hmmm…I am critical of myself here. Monitoring learning can happen in so many different ways, and with the varied learning skills within my class this is probably the most difficult area for me. Participation from the children individually would be the best way for me to monitor what is happening within the class. Being a class of 32 children, it is possible that I would miss one or two without the able assistance of the people who help in the classroom. Between us we discuss individual problems and ways of working with them, what helps them the most and often I divide the class up into groups, especially for maths. This allows different levels of skills to work to their capacity.

Tuesday 19th September

4.can attend to affective influences.
Demonstrating care and commitment is as essential as any of the other four points. Not only caring about the children and their achievements but in what I can give and learn from them daily. With little care from their teacher, the children will soon be apathetic towards their learning and their confidence will never grow. Sarcasm, cynicism, and general misbehaviour will follow quickly. Each must be considered as an individual and where I have failed to notice an individuals reaction or indifference towards a subject, difficulties have arisen.
5.can influence student outcomes
Teachers should, without question, be able to influence student outcomes, otherwise why teach? Do I? I believe so.
Working with children everyday, I learn from the children themselves what helps and what hinders them. Influence can be both positive and negative and I find that idea a little frightening and challenging, which keeps me on my toes. I know I can always improve myself in all areas of teaching and influencing their outcomes. I wonder sometimes, how vast or limited is Hattie’s ideas on outcomes. Human beings are complex and require more than just outcomes in their lives. Often when I am writing this Journal I can forget my training and understanding and try only to negotiate what I think my educators want to hear. Steiner has a magnificent outlook on life and the ‘outcomes’ are a whole life experience not just whether or not a set of syllabuses have been delivered, received and absorbed. I do not find that I am in conflict when reading other educationalists points of view, rather just adding them where applicable to my classroom and lesson structure. Outcomes need to be addressed, rethought and evaluated. Sometimes the outcomes for a particular lesson may be a social issue for one or two individuals and if the whole class has been privy to the experience then that is a wonderful thing. This may not fulfil the board of studies requirement but is crucial for the growing beings I have in front of me each day.

Friday 27th September
This journal started out with a purpose. I was to prove to myself that I am doing a great job. There was to be a beginning, middle and end but I don’t think I can end this subject. It seems an eternal quest, an ongoing curve of possibilities and the end is nowhere to be found. Education is for the teacher as well as the student and whilst I am capable of learning, the education of the children in my classroom will not grow stale.
Am I doing a great job?
Hmmmm.

Wednesday, June 21, 2006

Cognitive Education



Cognitive Education

Traditionally, education has always been looked upon as something that is provided by those who have life experience, training and wisdom of age. Elders of the community taught their learned wisdom to the young, who then passed this on to the following generations.
The recent age of intectuallism has brought this information to us in a conscious manner but has also been allowed to be pulled apart and reconstructed to suit a small percentage of the world community.

Education in the western world has been advocated that it can only be learnt in registered learning environments with qualified instructors who have been educated by, possibly not so wise, individuals. The “Three R’s” have been proposed, developed and implemented in western society and the public has been “educated” into believing that this the most important factor of education and that it must be taught/ imposed on children from an impossibly early age, negating all other forms of life education as a by-product of life. Were the human being just a thinking being, perhaps just a head, these principals would be for the most part ideal. But the human being has not only thought processes but feeling and will orientated processes within, and these must not be neglected in education.

The human spirit will always find ways to oppose dogma and individuals all over the world have achieved recognition for their studies in recognising the human being as a diverse and complex organism that requires sophisticated yet simple input into their beings to help them reach full potential.

Theorists such as Jean Piaget, Howard Gardner and Lev Vygotsky have approached education from different perspectives; all aiming for the same goal:
To realise that human beings are individuals and are capable of Receiving, Retaining and Returning, (perhaps a more justified “Three R’s”), universal knowledge, and developing a capacity, in turn, to share their knowledge with their communities and the world.




PIAGET
“Intelligence organizes the world by organizing itself.”
http://www.funderstanding.com/piaget.cfm

“Swiss biologist and psychologist Jean Piaget (1896-1980) is renowned for constructing a highly influential model of child development and learning. Piaget's theory is based on the idea that the developing child builds cognitive structures--in other words, mental "maps," schemes, or networked concepts for understanding and responding to physical experiences within his or her environment. Piaget further attested that a child's cognitive structure increases in sophistication with development, moving from a few innate reflexes such as crying and sucking to highly complex mental activities.

Discussion
Piaget's theory identifies four developmental stages and the processes by which children progress through them. The four stages are:

Sensorimotor stage (birth - 2 years old)--The child, through physical interaction with his or her environment, builds a set of concepts about reality and how it works. This is the stage where a child does not know that physical objects remain in existence even when out of sight (object permanence).

Preoperational stage (ages 2-7)--The child is not yet able to conceptualize abstractly and needs concrete physical situations.
Concrete operations (ages 7-11)--As physical experience accumulates, the child starts to conceptualize, creating logical structures that explain his or her physical experiences. Abstract problem solving is also possible at this stage. For example, arithmetic equations can be solved with numbers, not just with objects.


Formal operations (beginning at ages 11-15)--By this point, the child's cognitive structures are like those of an adult and include conceptual reasoning.


Piaget outlined several principles for building cognitive structures. During all development stages, the child experiences his or her environment using whatever mental maps he or she has constructed so far. If the experience is a repeated one, it fits easily--or is assimilated--into the child's cognitive structure so that he or she maintains mental "equilibrium." If the experience is different or new, the child loses equilibrium, and alters his or her cognitive structure to accommodate the new conditions. This way, the child erects more and more adequate cognitive structures.
How Piaget's Theory Impacts LearningCurriculum--Educators must plan a developmentally appropriate curriculum that enhances their students' logical and conceptual growth.
Instruction--Teachers must emphasize the critical role that experiences--or interactions with the surrounding environment--play in student learning. For example, instructors have to take into account the role that fundamental concepts, such as the permanence of objects, play in establishing cognitive structures.”

VYGOTSKY

Social Cognition”DefinitionThe social cognition learning model asserts that culture is the prime determinant of individual development. Humans are the only species to have created culture, and every human child develops in the context of a culture. Therefore, a child's learning development is affected in ways large and small by the culture--including the culture of family environment--in which he or she is enmeshed.

Modified version of Tharp & Gallimore's Four-Stage Model of ZPD (graphics added)

Discussion
Culture makes two sorts of contributions to a child's intellectual development. First, through culture children acquire much of the content of their thinking, that is, their knowledge. Second, the surrounding culture provides a child with the processes or means of their thinking, what Vygotskians call the tools of intellectual adaptation. In short, according to the social cognition learning model, culture teaches children both what to think and how to think.
Cognitive development results from a dialectical process whereby a child learns through problem-solving experiences shared with someone else, usually a parent or teacher but sometimes a sibling or peer.
Initially, the person interacting with child assumes most of the responsibility for guiding the problem solving, but gradually this responsibility transfers to the child.
Language is a primary form of interaction through which adults transmit to the child the rich body of knowledge that exists in the culture.
As learning progresses, the child's own language comes to serve as her primary tool of intellectual adaptation. Eventually, children can use internal language to direct their own behaviour.
Internalization refers to the process of learning--and thereby internalizing--a rich body of knowledge and tools of thought that first exist outside the child. This happens primarily through language.
A difference exists between what child can do on her own and what the child can do with help. Vygotskians call this difference the zone of proximal development.
Since much of what a child learns comes form the culture around her and much of the child's problem solving is mediated through an adult's help, it is wrong to focus on a child in isolation. Such focus does not reveal the processes by which children acquire new skills.
Interactions with surrounding culture and social agents, such as parents and more competent peers, contribute significantly to a child's intellectual development.

How Vygotsky Impacts Learning:Curriculum
Since children learn much through interaction, curricula should be designed to emphasize interaction between learners and learning tasks.

Instruction--With appropriate adult help, children can often perform tasks that they are incapable of completing on their own.
With this in mind, scaffolding--where the adult continually adjusts the level of his or her help in response to the child's level of performance--is an effective form of teaching. Scaffolding not only produces immediate results, but also instils the skills necessary for independent problem solving in the future.

Assessment--Assessment methods must take into account the zone of proximal development. What children can do on their own is their level of actual development and what they can do with help is their level of potential development. Two children might have the same level of actual development, but given the appropriate help from an adult, one might be able to solve many more problems than the other. Assessment methods must target both the level of actual development and the level of potential development.”


GARDNER

Multiple Intelligences Definition
"This theory of human intelligence, developed by psychologist Howard Gardner, suggests there are at least seven ways that people have of perceiving and understanding the world. Gardner labels each of these ways a distinct "intelligence"--in other words, a set of skills allowing individuals to find and resolve genuine problems they face.
DiscussionGardner defines “intelligence" as a group of abilities that:
Is somewhat autonomous from other human capacitiesHas a core set of information-processing operationsHas a distinct history in the stages of development we each pass throughHas plausible roots in evolutionary history

How Multiple Intelligences Impact LearningCurriculum
Traditional schooling heavily favours the verbal-linguistic and logical-mathematical intelligences. Gardner suggests a more balanced curriculum that incorporates the arts, self-awareness, communication, and physical education.

Instruction--
Gardner advocates instructional methods that appeal to all the intelligences, including role playing, musical performance, cooperative learning, reflection, visualization, story telling, and so on.

Assessment--This theory calls for assessment methods that take into account the diversity of intelligences, as well as self-assessment tools that help students understand their intelligences.”




Multiple Intelligence Lesson Plan Class 3
Mind Map


(seems to be unintelligible)

Constructivism
Reflection
Constructivism is life experience


Each of these constructivists offers a complex variety of ways to access a child’s full potential. All are valid and worthy of evaluation. In my working environment we work in similar ways, use similar methods. The days are always set out to cater for the whole being of the child.



The mornings cater for the thinking man. Mathematics, English, and Science are classroom activities. Here we work both individually and in groups to solve problems. The format of the lessons are approached from many different angles where problems are given in story form, work sheets, blackboard presentations, hands on experiments, role play, picture presentation and classroom discussions.

Throughout the middle of the school day we work with the feeling life of the child.
Language, music, painting, drama, story writing etc. are all approached with the students during this time, once again catering for the individual learning abilities of the child and providing an opportunity for the students to receive and give, to the class environment.

During the afternoon sessions we work with the Will of the students. Educating them through both Soft and Hard crafts. From the finest needle point and wool craft to working with timber, leather and metals, and engaging in sporting and gardening activities, the student’s Wills have been engaged.
Although not all lessons will appeal to all the students all the time there will always be something that each child will give and receive from and with this understanding of their school day comes a satisfaction, a completion that each area of their threefold-selves has been given an opportunity to shine.
This style of education is based on the teachings of Dr Rudolf Steiner who introduced Anthroposophy in the early 20th Century.

ICLT’S are not something I would offer children under the age of 12, and this is the age group with which I work. Although there is an almost infinite number of learning possibilities using ICT, children need to learn with their whole bodies not just their thinking function. To take a child and place them in front of a keyboard and screen will engage their thinking but isolates the rest of the child.
There is no will effort in moving a cursor around a screen and the intellect, although active, is unable to think freely as there is conformity in every box on the screen, even in the pixilation of the screen!
Drawings should be done on paper where, even inside a thought orientated lesson, the will is active and the feeling life is activated through colour, movement, imagination and form.
Hand writing needs to be developed and expressed and is possibly stunted if the children use a keypad instead of natural pencil and crayons. Colours are never quite real when using a computer and therefore a lie. Children need to be given truth at all times and the internet has infinite possibilities of offering false information and lewd websites and absorbs time better spent doing activities outside or in groups. We all talk about time wasted in front of the Television doing nothing and actually being bored but expound the wonders of the computer and internet.
Sensory development in neglected, body fat accumulates and the Will to do more than punch keys is lost. Children do not have the logical mind of an adult, and although this is developed as they grow and learn, cannot have it forced upon them at the tender ages of four. Here they are learning social behaviour, routine, joy of life, love, understanding, compassion. This they learn through bodily experience, not through their intellect and can gain nothing but a below average babysitting experience and time wasted from sitting in front of a screen.

This sounds harsh and critical. ICT I believe has its place; resources, ability to share with the world our ideas, provided we have the capacity to filter the useful from the useless. I myself have used the internet as a resource for my classroom activities or pictorial needs and find it a useful tool. Excel grade books could be useful if one had the time and energy to create a usable format but I prefer a personal touch using pen and paper and plenty of room to add personal notes for the individuals in my class. To ready the student for the adult world of high tech machinery can be left quite safely until high school. Technology changes everyday and the relevance of what a child learns on computers at a young age would be completely irrelevant by the time they are 18 years of age. No doubt there are many who would argue this but this is just my view point.


Howard Gardner’s Multiple Intelligence theory and Lev Vygotsky’s Zone of Proximal Development theory appeal to me because they consider the individual. We are all different. Our culture, heritage, language, educators and our peers, news items, advertising and TV programs all influence whom we are but we are still individuals. Choice gives us that individuality and a full bodied education will allow us to achieve our potential. Save the world of computers for when we are grown, as we are young for such a short time.
CRITICAL REFLECTION
unknown as yet...
(It is possible that trying to keep up with actual work load and Uni and Board of Studies requirements, has jam packed my mind and will need consturctivist theorists to unmesh this mess and find out how I could improve my classroom activities because no doubt it could always be improved. As colour said it is "a work in progress")